International news, News

What Exactly Is Going On With Janet Jackson’s Divorce?

http://jezebel.com/what-exactly-is-going-on-with-janet-jacksons-divorce-1794186901 #

Published 10 April 2017

Janet Jackson is ending her third marriage with husband Wissam Al Mana after five years. Ordinarily, news of this kind would be met with a tepid shrug because now that Brangelina is over, nothing can surprise me. However, the story is growing some peculiar legs due to some probably false and typically misogynistic rumors about the timing of the divorce announcement and a supposed payout.

Al Mana is extremely rich—billionaire rich. Janet Jackson, with a reported net worth of around $175 million, is, by most standards, also extremely rich. When two extremely rich people enter into a marriage they tend to sign prenups, which most assume Jackson and Al Mana did.

As TMZ notes, many prenups include specific payouts to one of the partners tied to the length of the marriage. With the announcement coming just months after their fifth anniversary, some are speculating that Janet specifically held off filing for divorce until after the five year mark in order to receive a settlement. (It wouldn’t be the first time a celebrity divorce is rumored to line up with this kind of timeline.) The number that has been pulled seemingly out of thin air is a $500 million payout, which seems extremely high and, again, probably came from some bored meme-creator on Twitter.

I find a couple things about this confusing. First, even for a billionaire, $500 million seems wildly excessive for just five years of marriage. I suppose you could argue that the addition of a child—Janet gave birth to their son on January 3 of this year—would sweeten the pot, but even then that number doesn’t make a great deal of sense.

Secondly, Janet is wealthy in her own right and has the potential to make even more money if she feels like it. It seems odd and unnecessary that she’d get married and go through an extremely high-risk pregnancy just for some cash.

I heard one theory that she got pregnant when she did to coincide with the marriage’s five-year mark so she could distract her husband before dropping the divorce bomb. Which, sure, is possible, I suppose, but that’s a lot of goddamn coordination when she could have arrived at a similar outcome in about 18 different ways.

Of course, it could just be that two consenting adults decided they didn’t want to be in this relationship anymore and money or potential monies played no factor whatsoever. The NY Daily News reports the coupled faced issues coming from “entirely different backgrounds,” but will continue to raise their son together.

 

Read More...

International news, Local news, News

US State Department attack on Nevis ‘unfounded and misleading’

http://www.caribbeannewsnow.com/topstory-US-State-Department-attack-on-Nevis-%27unfounded-and-misleading%27-33997.html #

Published April 4, 2017

By Caribbean News Now contributor

CHARLESTOWN, Nevis — In a press statement on Friday, Heidi-Lynn Sutton, the financial services regulator in the Nevis Island Administration (NIA), refuted as “unfounded and misleading” claims made by the US State Department that “financial oversight in Nevis remains problematic due to the federation allowing the creation of anonymous accounts, strong bank secrecy laws, and overall lack of transparency of beneficial ownership of legal entities.”

heidi-lynn_sutton2.jpg
Heidi-Lynn Sutton

The recently published State Department’s 2017 International Narcotics Control Strategy Report (INCSR) further stated that “the ambiguous regulatory framework regarding customer due diligence makes Nevis a desirable location for criminals to conceal proceeds”.

According to Sutton, the INCSR “delivers an attack on Nevis with allegations that are unfounded and misleading,” pointing out that measures have been in place since 2009 to mitigate money laundering and terrorist financing risks/threats to the financial services industry in Nevis.

“Therefore, we are of the view that there are adequate measures in place to monitor compliance with AML/CFT legislation,” the statement said, noting in particular, “the claim that there are strong bank secrecy laws in place is baseless… [and] the claim that St Kitts and Nevis allows the creation of anonymous accounts is erroneous.”

The INCSR was sharply critical of Eastern Caribbean islands in general for failing to curb drug trafficking and money laundering.

According to the report, the Eastern Caribbean hosts abundant transshipment points for illicit narcotics, primarily from Venezuela destined for North American, European and domestic Caribbean markets. However, no evidence was provided or any sources given for these assertions, which are in fact contradicted by other US government data, including radar maps:

suspect_air_activity.jpg

Image above depicts a recent relocatable over the horizon radar (ROTHR) mapping of drugs flights. With the demise of the flights from Colombia to The Bahamas due to a very strict airspace control and more grip on the airstrips in Northern Colombia, this map illustrates the new approach of the drug cartels. The start of most drug flights has been relocated very clearly to Western Venezuela, close to the river Orinoco marking the border between both countries. Conspicuous by their absence from detected suspicious flights on this map are the islands of the Eastern Caribbean

The unsubstantiated allegations in the report drew an immediate response from the government of Antigua and Barbuda rejecting such claims in their entirety.

The NIA has now published the following similarly detailed rejection of the claims made in the INCSR:

Regulatory framework regarding customer due diligence

The Anti-Money Laundering Regulations, 2011 (AMLR), Anti-Terrorism (Prevention of Terrorist Financing) Regulations, 2011 (ATR) and the Financial Services Implementation of Industry Standards Regulations 2011 (FSIISR) with appending Guidance Notes require all regulated entities to identify, verify, obtain, maintain and monitor beneficial owners of legal persons. The legislation is enforced by both of the St. Kitts and Nevis Branches of the Financial Services Regulatory Commission (FSRC).

The FSRC is the ultimate regulatory body for financial services and for anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) for St Kitts and Nevis. It was established by the Financial Services Regulatory Commission Act which was passed by the National Assembly on 20 October 2009. The FSRC monitors compliance by regulated persons and entities with the Proceeds of Crime Act, the Anti-Terrorism Act and such other Acts, regulations, codes or guidelines relating to money laundering or the financing of terrorism.

The above legislative and regulatory frameworks apply to all regulated persons and entities in Nevis which conduct fiduciary and financial services business in the following areas: the registration of international companies, the formation of trusts, the establishment of multiform foundations, international insurance companies, money services businesses, mutual funds, credit unions, international banks and the provision of citizenship by investment services.

It is impossible to claim that there is limited amount of information on the exact number of financial entities in the Federation as the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank and both Branches of the FSRC publish on their respective websites, the names, addresses and contact details of regulated entities under their supervision. Specifically in respect to Nevis, such information can be found on the Nevis Branch’s website.

As at December 31, 2016 the regulated entities supervised by Nevis Branch are as follows: insurance managers (18), money services businesses (3), international banks (1), registered agents (55), international insurance brokers (5) and international insurance companies (340).

The FSRC – Nevis Branch adopted a Risk-based Supervision (RBS) Framework in May 2015, which is applicable to both off-site and on-site examination of regulated entities. The IMF through CARTAC was instrumental in providing the necessary training and expertise to develop the RBS Framework for the FSRC – Nevis Branch. Through this partnership, CARTAC also provided technical assistance to assist the Branch in the conduct of an on-site examination of the sole licensed international bank in Nevis.

The RBS Framework includes the identification of and the assessment of risks, the quality of risk management oversight provided by compliance, internal audit, external audit, risk management, senior management and the board. A CARTAC consultant visited the Nevis Branch on 7 November 2016 to conduct a review of the RBS Framework implementation and the Branch was commended for the progress made in ensuring that important components of the framework were applied and the desired results were achieved. A summary of the framework can be accessed here.

Comprehensive on-site examinations of regulated entities in Nevis are conducted pursuant to section 4(2)(g) of the Financial Services Regulatory Commission Act, Cap 21.10 (FSRC Act) to ensure that the Act and enactments specified in Schedule 1 to the Act are being complied with and that the regulated entity is in a sound financial position and is managing its business in a prudent manner.

During an on-site examination, examiners from the FSRC – Nevis Branch will determine, among other things, whether there are appropriate policies and procedures established to ensure compliance with AML/CFT legislation and identify risk appropriately.

In order to achieve this, examiners will review all relevant customer files of the regulated entity as well as the citizenship by investment applications to ensure that adequate Know Your Customer (KYC) documents are obtained, maintained and up-to-date.

For the period January 2014 to December 2016, the FSRC – Nevis Branch conducted 53 full scope and follow-up on-site examinations in accordance with its RBS framework and on-site examination procedures. Compliance reports for all on-site examinations have been prepared by staff of the Branch, approved by the FSRC Board of Commissioners and disseminated to the board of directors and senior management of all assessed regulated entities. The entities are also advised of any corrective actions that should be implemented within stipulated timeframes.

Subject to section 40 of the FSRC Act and section 4(3) of the FSIISR, the Branch also undertook enforcement actions in 37 instances. Such actions included the issuing of warning letters, suspension or revocation notices and the granting of restricted licences. In 2017, the Nevis Branch intends to conduct 27 full scope and follow-up on-site examinations and it is on target to fulfil that mandate.

Statistics showing the number of on-site examinations that were conducted and enforcement actions undertaken by the FSRC – Nevis Branch are publicly available in the December editions of monthly Newsletters.

In 2017, the FSRC – Nevis Branch has also been successful in hosting its annual AML/CFT Awareness and Training Workshop for 12 consecutive years, a feat that no other jurisdiction in the OECS has achieved. This year saw the largest number of participants ever recorded with a total of 199 attendees from all regulated sectors. The continual increase in attendance is indicative of the importance that is placed on the fight against money laundering and terrorism financing. A press release was issued by the Branch.

Anonymous accounts

Section 69 of the Financial Services Implementation of Industry Standards Regulations 2011 specifically states that anonymously operated accounts are not allowed and that regulated businesses shall pay special attention to all complex, unusual large transactions or unusual patterns of transactions that have no apparent or visible economic or lawful purpose. They are required to examine the background and purpose of such transactions and to record their findings in writing and to keep such findings available. The claim that St Kitts and Nevis allows the creation of anonymous accounts is therefore erroneous.

Bank secrecy laws

Confidentiality provisions in both the Nevis International Banking Ordinance 2014 and the Banking Act 2015 are supported by the Confidential Relationships Act, Cap 21.02. This is the same level of protection given in all other jurisdictions that allow financial institutions to operate. However, confidential information from banks can be disclosed in connection with a request for information under an exchange of information agreement (TIEA or DTC) or in pursuance of a regulatory or criminal investigation. Therefore, the claim that there are strong bank secrecy laws in place is baseless.

The sole reference to the St Kitts and Nevis’ Third Round 2009 CFATF Mutual Evaluation Report without citing the subsequent follow-up reports is also disingenuous. In November 2014, the CFATF XL Plenary recognised that St. Kitts and Nevis had made significant progress in addressing the deficiencies in the 2009 Mutual Evaluation Report and therefore could exit the follow-up process. St Kitts and Nevis’ 9th Follow-Up Report contains a detailed description and analysis of the actions taken to rectify the deficiencies highlighted in the 2009 Report. Therefore, the public should be informed that in assessing St. Kitts and Nevis’ compliance with the FATF Recommendations, the 9th Follow-Up Report MUST be taken into account.

Furthermore, the Federation of St Kitts and Nevis’ Global Forum Phase 2 Peer Review Assessment was published in 2014 in which a rating of “Largely Compliant” was assigned. The rating is comparable with those achieved by countries such as Bermuda, Cayman Islands, Guernsey, United Kingdom and the United States. This demonstrates St. Kitts and Nevis’ high level of commitment and progress towards the implementation of the international standard of transparency and exchange of information. Copies of the CFATF Follow-Up Report and the Global Forum report can be accessed here.

Read More...

Business, International news, Local news, News

US Decision To Stop Funding The UN Population Fund May Affect C’bean Countries

Published: 5 April 2017

St Kitts and Nevis (WINN): The federation’s former Chief Medical Officer has been commenting on the US decision to stop funding the United Nations Population Fund.

Dr Patrick Martin tells WINN FM the move is not likely to affect St Kitts and Nevis as much as it may a few other Caribbean states and other nations of the world.

“The UN Population Fund is designed to help women to have a safe and healthy lifestyle,  I think that we are doing pretty well on local resources. The Population Fund is directed at having safe pregnancies, making sure that women have the right to choose and have control over their bodies, I think we could handle that with local funds. The family planning unit was very active back in the 70’s, 80’s and probably 90’s but I think since then, government and other agencies have been doing the necessary work. In other countries around the world the pulling of the United States support will affect UN programmes.”

WINN FM asked if the rest of the Caribbean would be affected.

“Probably places like Haiti and other parts of CARICOM like Guyana pops into my mind where the United Nations family programmes are very active. That’s not to say that we don’t need any support because support comes in technical ways in terms of research and documentation but some countries need direct financial support and the loss of that should see a rise in more women dying in pregnancy, more unintended pregnancies, botched abortions and that kind of stuff.”

WINN also asked Dr Martin to comment on the policies of the Trump administration regarding this aspect.

Dr Martin replied that “There are persons in the Trump administration who do not believe that women are equal to men and that women should not have control over their reproduction, that is very clear.”

Read More...

Business, International news, News

World food prices back down in March after two-year high: FAO

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-global-economy-food-idUSKBN1781BF #

Published: 6 April 2017

World food prices were back down in March after hitting a two-year high last month, with cereal harvests expected to be robust and markets stable this year, the United Nations food agency said on Thursday.

Prices for food products fell for five straight years due to ample supply, a slowing global economy and a strong U.S. dollar but in the last two months the index rose and reached 175.5 points in February, a record high since the same period in 2015.

In March the Food and Agriculture Organization’s (FAO) price index, which measures monthly price changes for a basket of cereals, oilseeds, dairy products, meat and sugar, averaged 171 points, down 2.8 percent compared to the previous month.

All food prices were down due to large supplies and the expectation of strong harvests, but meat ones were up 0.7 percent due to high demand for bovine and pig meat from Asia.

FAO forecasts global cereal production to be 2,597 million this year, just under the record output in 2016, because of a reduction in global wheat production and planting cuts expected in Australia, Canada and the United States.

The inching down with respect to last year is mainly due to an expected reduction in global wheat production, due to fall 2.7 percent this year.

Consumption of cereal is expected to grow by 0.8 percent in 2017 to 2,597 million tonnes as the use of grains for biofuels and to feed animals will grow less than in the past.

(Reporting by Giulia Segreti)

Read More...

Business, Economics, International news, News

Uncertainty over Brexit negotiations keeps sterling under pressure

Published: 6 April 2017

By Ritvik Carvalho | LONDON
Some British sterling money in coins and bank notes is seen September 2, 2005. BANKG REUTERS/Catherine Benson

Britain’s pound edged lower against the dollar on Thursday, as investors saw uncertainty surrounding Britain’s departure from the European Union outweighing some signs of economic resilience.

The pound bounced on Wednesday on stronger-than-expected services data, which gave investors a sign Britain’s dominant services sector — key to its economy — was still thriving.

But it reversed some of those gains on Thursday, as investors took the view that until either Britain or the EU shows signs of softening their negotiating stances, Brexit would be negative for the British economy.

Sterling was off 0.1 percent at $1.2479 by 0902 GMT. It was also 0.1 percent lower at 85.85 pence per euro.

“The moment I’ll turn my view around and turn materially long on sterling is when I know the European Union is willing to give Britain a good deal on services — financial services to be more specific,” said Jordan Rochester, currency strategist with Nomura.

“Confidence on both sides is pretty firm, so the initial talks are going to be slow and it’s not until mid-May when those talks start so we’re a good six weeks away from them.”

Sterling has lost nearly a fifth of its value against the dollar since Britain voted to leave the EU last June.

Since then, investors have broadly stayed bearish on the currency despite initial signs of resilience from the economy that confounded expectations of a slowdown, worried about long-term uncertainty surrounding Brexit.

Speculators took their bets against the pound versus the dollar to record high levels last month, and although they have since trimmed those short positions, they remain close to those levels. [IMM/FX]

European Council President Donald Tusk will meet British Prime Minister Theresa May in London on Thursday.

The EU’s chief negotiator, Michel Barnier, on Wednesday insisted that Britain must stop pressing for immediate parallel talks with the bloc on a post-Brexit free trade deal, and first agree on withdrawal terms.

Investors are now eyeing the EU summit on April 29, where EU directives for Brexit negotiations will be ratified.

“The ebb and flow of Brexit negotiations looks well underway, with PM May seemingly softening some of the red lines (e.g. free movement) during a transition period post-Brexit. Yet cable (sterling/dollar) could well trade well within $1.23-26 for a couple more weeks,” ING strategists wrote in a note to clients.

(Reporting by Ritvik Carvalho Editing by Jeremy Gaunt.)

Read More...